Attributed to Harita Mehta, Advocate High Court and Supreme Court
India’s family law framework, a complex weave of personal laws based on religious affiliation, has long governed matters of marriage, divorce, inheritance, custody, and adoption. However, as Indian society evolves—with rising interfaith unions, same-sex partnerships, surrogacy, single parenthood, and live-in relationships becoming more visible—the country’s legal framework remains stubbornly tied to outdated assumptions. This growing mismatch raises a pressing question: Can our legal system truly deliver justice if it fails to reflect the realities of the modern Indian family?
Colonial Roots, Contemporary Challenges
India’s personal law regime is primarily governed by religious texts and colonial-era statutes. For instance, the Hindu Marriage Act (1955), Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (1937), and the Indian Christian Marriage Act (1872) reflect societal norms of a bygone era. These laws continue to define family structures through heteronormative, patriarchal lenses. This leaves vast segments of Indian society—LGBTQIA+ couples, live-in partners, single mothers by choice, and interfaith families—without adequate legal recognition or protection.
For example, same-sex couples in India still lack the legal right to marry or adopt, despite the decriminalization of homosexuality in 2018. Similarly, while the Supreme Court has upheld the validity of live-in relationships, many civil rights like inheritance or next-of-kin status remain elusive for such couples. The rigidity of personal laws forces families to operate within narrow legal definitions that simply don’t reflect their lived experiences.
Inequity and Intersectionality
Beyond structural rigidity, India’s personal laws are marred by inequality. Women across religions often find themselves at a disadvantage, whether it’s unequal inheritance rights under Muslim law or the complicated procedures for divorce under Christian law. The triple talaq judgment in 2017 was a pivotal moment, but it also highlighted the need for broader systemic reform rather than piecemeal judicial interventions.
Family law in India often intersects with issues of caste, class, and gender—compounding the vulnerabilities of those already on the margins. For instance, Dalit women in inter-caste marriages may face violence and ostracization, with little recourse under current laws. Trans persons face procedural and legal hurdles in adopting or naming partners as nominees, despite constitutional protections.
The Case for a Uniform Civil Code?
The debate around the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) resurfaces periodically as a possible solution to the inconsistencies and discriminations within personal laws. While the idea of a common law for all citizens is enshrined in Article 44 of the Constitution, its implementation has been controversial. Critics argue that the UCC, if not formulated inclusively, may become a tool for majoritarianism rather than justice.
Rather than imposing uniformity, the need of the hour is a progressive, rights-based approach that respects diversity while ensuring equality. Legal reform must be rooted in constitutional values of dignity, privacy, autonomy, and non-discrimination. A truly modern family law framework must be gender-neutral, religion-neutral, and inclusive of all family configurations.
The Way Forward
Several steps can help bridge the gap between law and lived reality. Codification and standardization of family law should begin with extensive consultations involving stakeholders from diverse communities, genders, and orientations. Legal recognition for same-sex unions, equal adoption rights for all individuals irrespective of marital status, and simplified divorce processes must be prioritized. Education and awareness programs about legal rights and judicial reforms, such as fast-track family courts, are equally important.
The judiciary has shown glimpses of progress—from upholding the rights of live-in couples to expanding the definition of family. But systemic legislative reform is necessary to make these changes permanent and accessible. In a nation as pluralistic as India, family law must evolve not only to keep pace with societal change but to lead it.
Conclusion
India stands at a socio-legal crossroads. As families transform, the laws governing them must follow suit—not reluctantly, but boldly. It is time to reimagine India’s family law framework: not as a relic of the past, but as a living, responsive instrument of justice for the families of today and tomorrow.
